Examiner Mustafa A Amin has allowed 307 of 476 decided applications (65%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mustafa A Amin maintains a public record across four art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 476 decided applications, his allowance rate is 64%, reflecting 307 allowed and 169 abandoned applications. His allowance rate across individual art units ranges from 41% to 79%, indicating variation in disposition rates within the technology center. This pooled record aggregates applications from art units 2144, 2174, 2176, and 2194.
This pooled record aggregates allowance rates across multiple art units into a single overall figure. The 64% allowance rate describes past outcomes on 476 decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific case. Variation across art units (41% to 79%) reflects differing examination patterns within different subject areas. Pooled figures describe historical data; individual applications may diverge from these aggregate statistics.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 166 decided applications with an interview and 114 without.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 49 decided applications with an interview and 36 without.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 34 decided applications with an interview and 61 without.
Based on 16 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mustafa A Amin has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 514 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP