Examiner Mylinh T Tran has allowed 82 of 168 decided applications (49%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Mylinh T Tran maintains a public record across 3 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 168 decided applications, the examiner's allowance rate stands at 49%, with 82 allowed and 86 abandoned. The record spans multiple art units—2174, 2175, and 2179—and allowance rates across these units range from 46% to 63%. This pooled figure aggregates decisions across all three art units and reflects the examiner's overall disposition history in this technology center.
A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, producing a single allowance rate that represents the examiner's combined history. This aggregate figure describes what has occurred in past applications and does not predict the outcome of any specific application. Individual art units may show different allowance rates; the range reported here reflects that variation. Pooled statistics are useful context for understanding an examiner's overall record in a technology center.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 20 decided applications with an interview and 119 without.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Based on 27 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Mylinh T Tran has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 168 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP