Examiner Nabil M El Hady has allowed 55 of 77 decided applications (71%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Nabil M El Hady maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Across 77 disposed applications, the examiner issued 55 allowances and 22 abandonments, yielding an allowance rate of 71%. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes across different art units and reflects the examiner's historical record. The record does not characterize the examiner's approach to any particular application, nor does it forecast outcomes in future cases.
This record is a pooled aggregate across multiple art units within TC 2100. Aggregate allowance rates describe past dispositions and are not predictions of outcomes in specific applications. Pooled figures mask variation among individual art units; detail on each art unit's record appears separately. These statistics are correlational—they describe what occurred historically, not what will occur in any given prosecution.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 17 decided applications with an interview and 41 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Nabil M El Hady has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 77 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP