Examiner Nadeem Iqbal has allowed 1,358 of 1,468 decided applications (93%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Nadeem Iqbal maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning two art units (2114 and 2184). Across 1,468 disposed applications, 1,358 were allowed and 110 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 93%. The allowance rate across the examiner's art units ranges from 90% to 93%. This pooled figure represents the historical record of decided applications and does not constitute a prediction for any individual case.
A pooled record aggregates dispositions from multiple art units, creating an overall statistic that reflects past output across different subject areas within TC 2100. The allowance rate and range reflect historical decisions on applications that reached final disposition—either allowed or abandoned. Aggregate figures describe what occurred; they are not predictive models and do not indicate the outcome of any pending or future application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 167 decided applications with an interview and 1,280 without.
Primarily examines interconnection and data transfer between memory, I/O, and processing units.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Nadeem Iqbal has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 1,468 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP