LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/NADIA KHOSHNOODI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Nadia Khoshnoodi

TECH CENTER 2100 · 2 ART UNITS · 46 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION SEP 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 2 ART UNITS

Examiner Nadia Khoshnoodi has allowed 18 of 46 decided applications (39%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

39% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2137 · 41%AU 2133 · 29%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Nadia Khoshnoodi maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 46 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 39%. Of those decided applications, 18 were allowed and 28 were abandoned. The pooled record spans art units 2133 and 2137. This allowance rate reflects outcomes across both art units combined and describes the examiner's past record only.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates dispositions across multiple art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 39% is a historical summary across all decided cases and is not predictive of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask variation between individual art units; a separate section details per-art-unit breakdowns. Aggregate statistics describe past performance and do not indicate how any particular application will be examined.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2137
39 APPS · 41% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

41% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 68%
DISPOSITION16 / 23 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION40.8 moart unit avg 25.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY60.6 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
ART UNIT 2133
7 APPS · 29% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

29% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 82%
DISPOSITION2 / 5 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION37 moart unit avg 22.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY46.5 moart unit avg 34.8 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Nadia Khoshnoodi

  • What is Nadia Khoshnoodi's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 39% across 46 disposed applications in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • How many art units does this examiner work in?
    The pooled record covers 2 art units: 2133 and 2137, both within TC 2100.
  • Does the pooled allowance rate apply to my specific application?
    No. The pooled rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any individual application's outcome. Per-art-unit details may show variation and are published separately.
  • What do the 46 disposed applications represent?
    Disposed applications are decided cases—those allowed or abandoned. They exclude pending applications and form the denominator for the allowance rate calculation.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Nadia Khoshnoodi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 46 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP