Examiner Nadia Khoshnoodi has allowed 18 of 46 decided applications (39%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Nadia Khoshnoodi maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 46 disposed applications, the allowance rate stands at 39%. Of those decided applications, 18 were allowed and 28 were abandoned. The pooled record spans art units 2133 and 2137. This allowance rate reflects outcomes across both art units combined and describes the examiner's past record only.
This pooled record aggregates dispositions across multiple art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 39% is a historical summary across all decided cases and is not predictive of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask variation between individual art units; a separate section details per-art-unit breakdowns. Aggregate statistics describe past performance and do not indicate how any particular application will be examined.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Nadia Khoshnoodi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 46 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP