Examiner Nasser Moazzami Goodarzi has allowed 269 of 285 decided applications (94%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Nasser Moazzami Goodarzi maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 285 disposed applications, the examiner issued 269 allowances and 16 abandonments, yielding an allowance rate of 94%. This rate reflects the proportion of decided applications—those allowed or abandoned—and excludes any pending matters. The record spans art units 2136 and 2187 within TC 2100.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's activity across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 94% allowance rate describes historical disposal outcomes and is computed from decided applications only. Aggregate statistics describe the past record and are not predictions about the outcome of any specific application. Individual art-unit records may differ from the pooled figure.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 15 decided applications with an interview and 268 without.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Nasser Moazzami Goodarzi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 285 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP