Examiner Nathan H Brown Jr has allowed 361 of 430 decided applications (84%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Nathan H Brown Jr maintains a public record across two art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 430 disposed applications, he allowed 361, yielding an 84% allowance rate. His allowance rates range from 65% to 86% across these art units. This pooled figure represents a single aggregate measurement of past decisions and does not describe performance in any specific art unit or predict outcomes in individual applications.
A pooled record aggregates an examiner's decisions across multiple art units. The 84% allowance rate shown here is a historical summary—the ratio of allowed to all decided applications—calculated across two distinct art units with potentially different examination patterns. This aggregate figure describes the past record only and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual art units may show different rates.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 75 decided applications with an interview and 306 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Nathan H Brown Jr has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 430 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP