Examiner Neveen Abel Jalil has allowed 133 of 339 decided applications (39%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Neveen Abel Jalij has a public record spanning three art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 339 disposed applications, 133 were allowed, resulting in an overall allowance rate of 39%. The allowance rate varies across the examiner's art units, ranging from 32% to 68%. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes from all three art units and reflects historical disposal data only.
A pooled record aggregates all applications across multiple art units into a single allowance rate. This figure describes what occurred historically across the examiner's combined art-unit portfolio and is not a prediction for any individual case. Allowance rates vary by art unit; the range shown (32% to 68%) reflects that variance. Pooled statistics are useful for understanding the examiner's overall profile but do not predict outcomes in specific applications.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 48 decided applications with an interview and 185 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Neveen Abel Jalil has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 339 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP