Examiner Nghi V Tran has allowed 54 of 99 decided applications (55%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Nghi V Tran's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 99 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 54 and abandoned 45, for an allowance rate of 55%. This rate describes the share of decided applications in the examiner's pooled record. The examiner works in a single art unit (2151). The allowance rate is based on applications that were decided—either allowed or abandoned—and does not account for pending applications.
This pooled record aggregates an examiner's performance across all art units in their assignment. The allowance rate and disposal count describe past outcomes and serve as historical context. These figures are not predictions of any specific application's outcome. An aggregate allowance rate masks variation across different art units and does not indicate how any single application will be examined or decided.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 26 decided applications with an interview and 73 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Nghi V Tran has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 99 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP