LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/NICHOLAS B SHINE
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Nicholas B Shine

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 40 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Nicholas B Shine has allowed 15 of 40 decided applications (38%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

38% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Nicholas B Shine maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. His pooled record covers 68 total applications, of which 40 have been disposed (decided). Among those decided applications, 15 were allowed and 25 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 38% across the disposed count. This record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final resolution and does not include pending matters.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all of the examiner's activity across one art unit. The 38% allowance rate describes the share of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) and reflects past outcomes only. Aggregate figures describe historical record and are not predictions about the outcome of any individual application. Per-art-unit detail, where available, may provide additional context.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2126
68 APPS · 38% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.

38% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 63%
DISPOSITION15 / 25 / 28allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION35.9 moart unit avg 29.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY57.2 moart unit avg 44.4 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility91% · art unit 53%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)50%
§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 88%
§112 — Written description & definiteness75%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW59%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW11%+48 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 22 decided applications with an interview and 18 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Nicholas B Shine

  • What is Examiner Shine's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 38% across 40 disposed applications in the examiner's pooled record. This figure reflects applications that have reached final decision (allowed or abandoned) and excludes pending matters.
  • How many art units does Examiner Shine cover?
    Examiner Shine's public record spans one art unit (2126) in TC 2100.
  • What does the allowance rate mean?
    The allowance rate is the percentage of decided applications that were allowed, calculated only from disposed (decided) cases. It is a historical statistic and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome.
  • How many applications has Examiner Shine reviewed?
    The examiner's pooled record includes 68 total applications. Of those, 40 have been disposed (decided), 25 were abandoned, and 15 were allowed.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Nicholas B Shine has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 68 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP