Examiner Nicholas B Shine has allowed 15 of 40 decided applications (38%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Nicholas B Shine maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. His pooled record covers 68 total applications, of which 40 have been disposed (decided). Among those decided applications, 15 were allowed and 25 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 38% across the disposed count. This record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final resolution and does not include pending matters.
This pooled record aggregates all of the examiner's activity across one art unit. The 38% allowance rate describes the share of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) and reflects past outcomes only. Aggregate figures describe historical record and are not predictions about the outcome of any individual application. Per-art-unit detail, where available, may provide additional context.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 22 decided applications with an interview and 18 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Nicholas B Shine has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 68 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP