Examiner Nicholas F Woronko

What the data says.

Nicholas F Woronko maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 22 disposed applications, he has allowed 5 and abandoned 17, yielding an allowance rate of 23% over the decided count. His practice spans a single art unit (2169). This pooled record reflects outcomes on applications that have reached final disposition; it does not include pending matters. The 23% allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only and does not represent a share of all filings.

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates dispositions across all art units under an examiner's management. The allowance rate describes past outcomes on decided applications and reflects historical data only. Aggregate figures do not predict the outcome of any individual application, as each case presents distinct claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history. Pooled statistics are descriptive of the examiner's overall record and serve as context for understanding patterns across their practice.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Nicholas F Woronko

• 01What is Nicholas F Woronko's overall allowance rate?

  His allowance rate is 23%, calculated from 5 allowed applications among 22 total disposed applications in his pooled record.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  Nicholas F Woronko's public record spans one art unit (2169) within Technology Center 2100.
• 03Does the pooled allowance rate predict the outcome of my application?

  No. The pooled rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Each application is evaluated on its own merits, including claim scope and prior art.
• 04What is the difference between total applications and disposed applications?

  Total applications include all filings. Disposed applications are those that have reached final decision (allowed or abandoned). The allowance rate is calculated from disposed applications only; pending cases are excluded.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.