Examiner Noor Alkhateeb has allowed 75 of 134 decided applications (56%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Patent Examiner Noor Alkhateeb maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 159 total applications, the examiner has allowed 75 and seen 59 abandoned, for a pooled allowance rate of 56% over 134 disposed applications. The record spans one art unit. This allowance rate represents the percentage of applications that have been decided—either allowed or abandoned—and does not include pending applications. The figure describes the examiner's historical record and is not a prediction of outcomes in any future or specific case.
A pooled record aggregates disposal data across all art units assigned to an examiner. The allowance rate shown here reflects past decisions in combination, not a breakdown by individual art unit or technology area. Aggregate figures describe historical outcomes and serve as a reference for understanding an examiner's overall record. They are correlational snapshots, not causal models or forecasts of individual application results.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 96 decided applications with an interview and 38 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Noor Alkhateeb has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 159 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP