Examiner Noosha Arjomandi has allowed 822 of 914 decided applications (90%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Noosha Arjomandi's public record spans 3 art units within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 914 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 822, yielding an overall allowance rate of 90%. This rate reflects decided cases only and excludes pending applications. The allowance rate across the examiner's art units ranges from 87% to 100%, indicating variation in outcomes by art unit. The pooled figure of 90% represents an aggregate of the examiner's work across all three art units.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across multiple art units into a single pooled allowance rate. The 90% figure describes past outcomes across 914 decided applications and is historical data only—not a prediction for any specific case. Pooled rates combine different subject areas and examination patterns; the range (87% to 100%) reflects how outcomes vary by individual art unit. These statistics show the examiner's overall record and do not predict the disposition of any particular application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 188 decided applications with an interview and 508 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 59 decided applications with an interview and 158 without.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Noosha Arjomandi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 944 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP