Examiner Oanh Duong has allowed 85 of 121 decided applications (70%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Oanh Duong maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), covering one art unit. Across 121 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 85 and abandoned 36, yielding an allowance rate of 70%. This rate reflects the ratio of allowed applications to all decided applications in the examiner's pooled record. The figures represent historical outcomes only and do not constitute predictions for any pending or future application.
This pooled record aggregates all art units under the examiner's jurisdiction. The allowance rate—calculated as allowed applications divided by disposed applications—describes the examiner's past record. Aggregate figures reflect historical volume and outcomes; they are not predictions for any individual application. For detail specific to a particular art unit, refer to the per-art-unit section of this page.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 32 decided applications with an interview and 89 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Oanh Duong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 121 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP