Examiner Olatoyosi Olude Afolabi has allowed 306 of 352 decided applications (87%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Olatoyosi Olude Afolabi maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning two art units. Across 352 disposed applications, 306 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 87%. The allowance rate range across the examiner's art units extends from 87% to 88%. This pooled record aggregates outcomes from both art units and reflects historical dispositions only.
A pooled record combines statistics from multiple art units into a single summary. The overall allowance rate and disposed count describe past outcomes across all art units together. These figures are historical data and do not predict the outcome of any individual application. Per-art-unit detail, where available, appears separately and may show variation within the overall aggregate.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 70 decided applications with an interview and 233 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 49 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Olatoyosi Olude Afolabi has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 352 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP