Examiner Olga Hernandez has allowed 43 of 66 decided applications (65%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Olga Hernandez maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 66 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 43 and abandoned 23, yielding an allowance rate of 65%. This rate reflects the examiner's historical output in art unit 2144 and represents past dispositions only. The pooled record spans a single art unit. These figures describe what occurred in decided cases and do not predict outcomes in any pending or future application.
This record aggregates the examiner's history across all assigned art units within TC 2100. Pooled allowance rates combine dispositions from potentially different subject areas and examination contexts. An aggregate figure is a historical summary and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual art units may show different patterns; consult the art-unit breakdown for finer detail.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Olga Hernandez has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 66 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP