LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/OLGA HERNANDEZ
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Olga Hernandez

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 66 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION AUG 2005
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Olga Hernandez has allowed 43 of 66 decided applications (65%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

65% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Olga Hernandez maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 66 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 43 and abandoned 23, yielding an allowance rate of 65%. This rate reflects the examiner's historical output in art unit 2144 and represents past dispositions only. The pooled record spans a single art unit. These figures describe what occurred in decided cases and do not predict outcomes in any pending or future application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This record aggregates the examiner's history across all assigned art units within TC 2100. Pooled allowance rates combine dispositions from potentially different subject areas and examination contexts. An aggregate figure is a historical summary and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual art units may show different patterns; consult the art-unit breakdown for finer detail.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2144
66 APPS · 65% ALLOWANCE
65% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 58%
DISPOSITION43 / 23 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION12.6 moart unit avg 27.2 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY31.7 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Olga Hernandez

  • What is Examiner Hernandez's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 65%, based on 43 allowed and 23 abandoned applications out of 66 total disposed applications.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    This examiner's record spans 1 art unit (art unit 2144) within Technology Center 2100.
  • Does the pooled rate predict what will happen to my application?
    No. The pooled allowance rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual applications may be disposed differently.
  • What subject matter does this examiner handle?
    This examiner works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Olga Hernandez has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 66 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP