Examiner Olubusola Omosewo

What the data says.

Olubusola Omosewo maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over a pooled record spanning one art unit, the examiner has disposed of 28 applications. Of those decided applications, 11 were allowed and 17 were abandoned, resulting in an allowance rate of 39%. This figure represents the share of decided applications that received approval, excluding any pending matters. The record reflects outcomes across all art units in which the examiner has worked.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record aggregates all art units in which the examiner works. The allowance rate of 39% describes the examiner's historical outcomes across decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's fate. Aggregate statistics reflect past dispositions and vary by art unit, prosecution history, claim scope, and other case-specific factors. Individual art-unit records may differ from the pooled figure.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Olubusola Omosewo

• 01What is Olubusola Omosewo's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 39%, based on 11 allowed applications and 17 abandoned applications out of 28 total disposed applications in the examiner's pooled record.
• 02How many art units does this examiner work in?

  The examiner's public record spans one art unit within TC 2100.
• 03Does the pooled allowance rate apply to my specific application?

  No. The pooled figure describes past outcomes across all art units and is not a prediction of any specific application. Individual cases vary based on claim scope, prior art, examiner assignment, and prosecution history.
• 04What technology does this examiner examine?

  The examiner works in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.