Examiner Oscar Wehovz has allowed 90 of 130 decided applications (69%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Oscar Wehovz maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), spanning one art unit. Across 154 total applications, 130 have been disposed (decided). Of those 130 decided applications, 90 were allowed and 40 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 69%. This rate reflects the ratio of allowances to all decided applications in the examiner's pooled record and does not include pending cases.
This pooled record aggregates data across all art units in which the examiner works. The allowance rate of 69% describes outcomes on decided applications in the past and is a historical summary, not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask variation across individual art units; detailed per-unit records appear separately on this page.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 75 decided applications with an interview and 55 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Oscar Wehovz has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 154 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP