Examiner Osman M Alshack has allowed 467 of 537 decided applications (87%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Osman M Alshack maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 537 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 467 and abandoned 70, yielding an allowance rate of 87% over the decided record. The examiner's pooled caseload spans a single art unit. This aggregate record reflects historical disposition data and does not constitute a prediction for any specific pending application.
This examiner's record is pooled across art units—figures represent combined output across multiple technical areas. The allowance rate of 87% describes the ratio of allowed to decided applications in the examiner's past record only. Aggregate statistics describe what occurred historically, not what will occur on any particular case. Individual art-unit breakdowns appear elsewhere and may show variation from the pooled figure.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines error detection, correction, and monitoring, and error-correcting coding/decoding.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 293 decided applications with an interview and 244 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Osman M Alshack has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 585 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP