Examiner Patrick E Sweeney has allowed 15 of 31 decided applications (48%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Patrick E Sweeney has a public record spanning 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 31 disposed applications, 15 were allowed and 16 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 48%. This rate reflects the proportion of decided applications in the examiner's pooled record. The record aggregates activity across multiple art units within TC 2100, and the overall figures represent the combined outcome of work in those units.
A pooled, cross-art-unit record combines data from multiple art units into a single aggregate. The overall allowance rate describes historical outcomes across all units combined and does not constitute a prediction about any specific application. Aggregate figures reflect past dispositions and are descriptive of the examiner's record as a whole. Individual art-unit data may differ from the pooled average and appears separately on this page.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Patrick E Sweeney has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 31 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP