Examiner Patrick Randal Ramsey has allowed 37 of 115 decided applications (32%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Patrick Randal Ramsey maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 115 disposed applications, he has allowed 37 and abandoned 78. His overall allowance rate is 32% of decided applications. His record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure reflects outcomes across all applications in his record and does not constitute a prediction for any individual application.
This examiner's record is pooled across art units, aggregating allowance rates and application counts from all assignments. The 32% allowance rate describes the past record only—the share of decided applications that issued. Pooled figures are historical summaries and are not predictive of any specific pending application. Per-art-unit detail, where available, may reveal variation within the examiner's practice.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 42 decided applications with an interview and 73 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Patrick Randal Ramsey has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 115 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP