LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/PAUL E CALLAHAN
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Paul E Callahan

TECH CENTER 2100 · 3 ART UNITS · 151 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JAN 2009
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 3 ART UNITS

Examiner Paul E Callahan has allowed 113 of 151 decided applications (75%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

75% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
AU 2137 · 78%AU 2134 · 44%AU 2132 · 0%
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Paul E Callahan maintains a public record across three art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 151 disposed applications, he allowed 113 and abandoned 38, for an overall allowance rate of 75%. This rate reflects the aggregate outcome of decided cases pooled across all three art units within TC 2100. The breadth of his record spans multiple art units, meaning the pooled figure represents an average across different subject areas and examination contexts within the technology center.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled, cross-art-unit record aggregates dispositions across multiple art-unit assignments and presents a single allowance rate as a historical average. This aggregate figure describes the examiner's past record and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual art units may exhibit different allowance rates; a separate section displays per-art-unit detail. Pooled data is useful for understanding broad patterns in an examiner's decisions but does not account for case-by-case variation.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2137
139 APPS · 78% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

78% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 68%
DISPOSITION109 / 30 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION30.5 moart unit avg 25.8 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY53.5 moart unit avg 41.7 mo
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW85%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW75%+10 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 47 decided applications with an interview and 92 without.

ART UNIT 2134
9 APPS · 44% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines network security, and computer and data security.

44% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 67%
DISPOSITION4 / 5 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION12.2 moart unit avg 35.6 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY27.7 moart unit avg 50.7 mo
ART UNIT 2132
3 APPS · 0% ALLOWANCE · LIMITED DATA

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.

0% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 72%
DISPOSITION0 / 3 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION9.8 moart unit avg 27.4 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY16.1 moart unit avg 41 mo
// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Paul E Callahan

  • What is Paul E Callahan's overall allowance rate?
    His overall allowance rate is 75%, calculated across 151 disposed applications (113 allowed, 38 abandoned). This figure is pooled across all art units in his record.
  • How many art units does his record cover?
    His public record spans 3 art units (2132, 2134, 2137) within Technology Center 2100. The pooled allowance rate aggregates outcomes across all three.
  • Does the pooled rate apply to my application?
    No. The pooled allowance rate is a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Actual results depend on claim scope, prior art, and examination of the merits in each case.
  • Can I see how his allowance rate varies by art unit?
    Yes. A separate section of this page displays allowance rates for each individual art unit. Do not attribute any specific rate to any art unit based on this pooled summary.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Paul E Callahan has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 151 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP