Examiner Paul H Kang has allowed 92 of 109 decided applications (84%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Paul H Kang maintains a public record of 109 disposed applications across Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of these decided applications, 92 were allowed and 17 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 84%. His record spans two art units: 2141 and 2144. The allowance rate ranges from 84% to 85% across these art units, reflecting modest variation in the aggregated figures.
This pooled record aggregates Kang's work across multiple art units within TC 2100. The overall allowance rate of 84% describes the examiner's past decisions on 109 closed applications and does not constitute a prediction about any specific application. Aggregate figures reflect historical performance across different subject areas and are provided for reference only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 18 decided applications with an interview and 58 without.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Paul H Kang has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 109 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP