Examiner Paul H. Nguyen-Ba has allowed 9 of 36 decided applications (25%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Paul H. Nguyen-Ba maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 36 disposed applications, he allowed 9 and abandoned 27, yielding an allowance rate of 25%. His practice spans a single art unit. The allowance rate is computed from decided applications only and does not reflect pending filings. This record represents a historical aggregate and is not a prediction of outcomes in any specific application.
This examiner's pooled record aggregates statistics from all art units in which he has worked. The allowance rate and application counts reflect cumulative, past-decided cases and describe historical performance only. Pooled figures do not forecast results in individual applications or predict how any given case will be examined or decided. Each application is evaluated on its own merits.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Paul H. Nguyen-Ba has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 36 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP