Examiner Pavan Mamillapalli has allowed 655 of 800 decided applications (82%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Pavan Mamillapalli maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 833 total applications, 800 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). Of those 800 decided applications, 655 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 82%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure describes the examiner's historical record and does not represent a prediction for any specific application.
This examiner's record is pooled across one art unit within TC 2100. The allowance rate (82%) aggregates all decided cases in that unit and reflects past outcomes only. Pooled figures describe the historical record; they are not predictions about any particular application. Art-unit-specific data, where available, may show variation within the examiner's overall record.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 356 decided applications with an interview and 444 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Pavan Mamillapalli has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 833 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP