LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/PAVAN MAMILLAPALLI
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Pavan Mamillapalli

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 800 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Pavan Mamillapalli has allowed 655 of 800 decided applications (82%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

82% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Pavan Mamillapalli maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 833 total applications, 800 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). Of those 800 decided applications, 655 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 82%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure describes the examiner's historical record and does not represent a prediction for any specific application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

This examiner's record is pooled across one art unit within TC 2100. The allowance rate (82%) aggregates all decided cases in that unit and reflects past outcomes only. Pooled figures describe the historical record; they are not predictions about any particular application. Art-unit-specific data, where available, may show variation within the examiner's overall record.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2159
833 APPS · 82% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

82% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 63%
DISPOSITION655 / 145 / 33allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION20.1 moart unit avg 22.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY37.3 moart unit avg 45.1 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility56% · art unit 55%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)62%
§103 — Obviousness81% · art unit 82%
§112 — Written description & definiteness26%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW90%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW75%+15 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 356 decided applications with an interview and 444 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Pavan Mamillapalli

  • What is Examiner Mamillapalli's allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 82%, calculated from 655 allowed applications out of 800 decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) in the public record.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    The examiner's public record spans one art unit (2159) within TC 2100.
  • What does the pooled record represent?
    The pooled record aggregates all applications across the examiner's art unit(s). The figures describe historical outcomes and are not predictions for any specific application.
  • How many applications are included in this record?
    The record includes 833 total applications, of which 800 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). The allowance rate is based on the 800 decided applications.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Pavan Mamillapalli has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 833 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP