Examiner Pedro Jesus Morales has allowed 7 of 10 decided applications (70%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Pedro Jesus Morales maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 39 total applications, 10 have been disposed (allowed or abandoned). Of those 10 decided applications, 7 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 70%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure represents past outcomes on decided applications and does not constitute a prediction for any specific pending or future application.
This pooled record aggregates all of the examiner's work across TC 2100 into a single allowance rate. The 70% figure reflects outcomes on 10 decided applications and describes the historical record only. Pooled statistics combine different art units and do not forecast the outcome of any particular application. Past rates are correlational observations, not predictive tools or causal indicators of how any single case will be examined or decided.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 39 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Pedro Jesus Morales has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 39 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP