Examiner Peng Ke has allowed 118 of 254 decided applications (46%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Peng Ke maintains a public record across 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 254 disposed applications, 118 were allowed, yielding an overall allowance rate of 46%. The examiner's allowance rate ranges from 37% to 91% across these art units, reflecting variation in outcomes by subject-matter area within TC 2100. The record spans 284 total applications, of which 136 were abandoned.
This record aggregates Peng Ke's decisions across multiple art units within TC 2100. The pooled allowance rate—46% of decided cases—describes past outcomes and is not a prediction of any specific application. The range of allowance rates (37% to 91%) illustrates that results differ by art unit. To understand performance in a particular subject area, consult the examiner's per-art-unit breakdown.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 63 decided applications with an interview and 148 without.
Primarily examines program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 17 decided applications with an interview and 26 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Peng Ke has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 284 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP