This examiner has a small public record (26applications), so we don't publish a record summary — small samples over-state patterns. The per-art-unit figures below are shown for completeness.
Peter Li Yuan's public record spans Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). His pooled record covers 26 total applications. Of those applications, zero have been allowed and zero have been abandoned, resulting in zero disposed (decided) applications. Because no applications have been decided, an allowance rate cannot be calculated. His record encompasses a single art unit. The data reflects completed dispositions only; pending applications are excluded from this summary.
This pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units in which the examiner has acted. The figures presented—total applications, dispositions, and allowance rates—describe the examiner's historical record and do not constitute predictions about any specific pending application. When reviewing a pooled profile spanning multiple art units, the aggregate statistics reflect a mixture of different subject areas and examination contexts. Individual application outcomes vary based on claim scope, prior art, and applicant responses.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines program control and execution, and software engineering.
Based on 26 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Peter Li Yuan has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 26 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP