Examiner Phat Ngoc Le has allowed 8 of 10 decided applications (80%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Phat Ngoc Le maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 50 total applications, 10 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). Of those 10 decided applications, 8 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 80%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit, meaning all statistics reflect activity within one classification area. This allowance rate is calculated from decided applications only; pending applications are excluded from the percentage.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across all assigned art units—in this case, one—and presents aggregate statistics. The allowance rate of 80% describes the examiner's historical disposal record and does not constitute a prediction about any specific application. Aggregate figures reflect past outcomes across all applications decided, and individual case outcomes may vary. Understanding the scope (number of art units) helps contextualize the breadth of the examiner's portfolio.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines data-processing methods for specific functions, and processing data by its order or content.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Phat Ngoc Le has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 50 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP