Examiner Philip B Tran

What the data says.

Philip B Tran maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning one art unit. His pooled record encompasses 147 disposed applications, of which 115 were allowed and 32 abandoned. This yields an allowance rate of 78% across all decided cases. The allowance rate reflects the ratio of allowed applications to the total number of disposed applications and does not include pending cases. This record aggregates outcomes across the single art unit in his portfolio.

How to read these numbers.

This pooled record combines outcomes from one art unit within TC 2100. Aggregate figures describe the examiner's historical record across all decided applications but do not forecast any individual application's outcome. Each art unit may have distinct examination patterns; this summary reflects the combined data only. The allowance rate is a historical measure of disposed cases and is not a prediction about any specific pending or future application.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Philip B Tran

• 01What is Philip B Tran's overall allowance rate?

  His pooled allowance rate is 78%, calculated from 115 allowed applications out of 147 disposed applications.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  Philip B Tran's public record spans one art unit (2155) within Technology Center 2100.
• 03What does this allowance rate tell me about my application?

  This rate describes the examiner's past record on decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Each application is examined individually.
• 04What is the subject matter of this examiner's work?

  Philip B Tran examines applications in TC 2100, which covers Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.