Examiner Phillip H Nguyen has allowed 882 of 953 decided applications (93%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Phillip H Nguyen holds a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 981 total applications, 882 have been allowed and 71 abandoned, for a disposed count of 953 applications. The allowance rate is 93%, calculated from the 953 decided applications. The examiner's record spans a single art unit, 2191. This pooled figure reflects the examiner's past dispositions and does not forecast the outcome of any individual application.
This pooled record aggregates all applications across the examiner's art unit(s) in TC 2100. The 93% allowance rate describes past-decided applications only and excludes pending matters. Pooled figures are historical summaries and are not predictive of any specific application's path. Individual cases vary by claim scope, prior art, and prosecution history.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering, and error detection, correction, and monitoring.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 378 decided applications with an interview and 575 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Phillip H Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 981 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP