LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/POLINA G PEACH
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Polina G Peach

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 512 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION JUN 2026
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Polina G Peach has allowed 279 of 512 decided applications (54%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

54% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Polina G Peach maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 558 total applications, 279 have been allowed and 233 abandoned, yielding 512 disposed applications. The allowance rate stands at 54%, computed from the 512 decided applications. This record spans a single art unit, providing a pooled view of prosecution activity in this technology center. The figures describe the examiner's historical record and do not constitute a prediction about any specific pending application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates data across all art units under an examiner's jurisdiction. The allowance rate of 54% reflects outcomes on 512 decided applications—allowed plus abandoned cases—and represents the examiner's past record. This aggregate figure describes historical performance and is not a prediction of the outcome on any individual application. Applicants review pooled data to understand an examiner's overall pattern of dispositions across their assigned art units.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2165
558 APPS · 54% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

54% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 63%
DISPOSITION279 / 233 / 46allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION20 moart unit avg 22.5 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY45 moart unit avg 39.6 mo
// REJECTION PROFILE
§101 — Subject-matter eligibility71% · art unit 54%
§102 — Anticipation (novelty)66%
§103 — Obviousness99% · art unit 82%
§112 — Written description & definiteness66%
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW60%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW48%+12 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 284 decided applications with an interview and 228 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Polina G Peach

  • What is Polina G Peach's overall allowance rate?
    The allowance rate is 54%, based on 512 disposed applications (279 allowed, 233 abandoned). This is a historical figure and not a prediction of outcome on any specific application.
  • How many art units does this record cover?
    This pooled record covers one art unit. The figures aggregate all applications and dispositions within that unit.
  • What technology center does this examiner work in?
    The examiner is assigned to Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), which is the subject matter of this pooled record.
  • Does the allowance rate predict my application's outcome?
    No. The 54% allowance rate describes past dispositions on 512 decided applications. It is not a prediction of the outcome on any pending or future application.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Polina G Peach has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 558 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP