Examiner Ponnoreay Pich has allowed 38 of 74 decided applications (51%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Ponnoreay Pich maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 74 disposed applications, the examiner issued allowances in 38 cases, yielding a 51% allowance rate. The record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure represents the share of decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) and does not include pending matters. The allowance rate describes the examiner's past record and is not a prediction of the outcome in any particular application.
This profile aggregates the examiner's record across all their assigned art units in TC 2100. The allowance rate and application counts are pooled figures, meaning they combine data from multiple art units if present. Aggregate statistics describe historical disposal patterns and are correlational only—they do not predict specific application outcomes or reflect examiner intent. Each application is distinct and subject to its own claim language, prior art, and prosecution history.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 20 decided applications with an interview and 54 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ponnoreay Pich has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 74 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP