Examiner Pramila Parthasarathy has allowed 98 of 153 decided applications (64%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Pramila Parthasarathy maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 153 disposed applications, the examiner issued 98 allowances and 55 abandonments, yielding an allowance rate of 64% over the decided count. The examiner's practice spans a single art unit within TC 2100. This pooled record reflects outcomes across all applications decided by this examiner in the technology center and does not indicate the outcome of any pending or future application.
A pooled record aggregates dispositions across all art units assigned to an examiner. The allowance rate represents historical outcomes—allowed and abandoned applications only—and reflects past decision patterns. This figure is a description of what occurred, not a prediction for any specific application. Different art units within the technology center may have varying characteristics. Pooled statistics describe aggregate experience and do not forecast individual case outcomes.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 36 decided applications with an interview and 117 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Pramila Parthasarathy has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 153 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP