LYNCH·LLP
HOME/EXAMINERS/TC 2100/PRAMILA PARTHASARATHY
◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT
◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Pramila Parthasarathy

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 153 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION SEP 2008
ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED
OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Pramila Parthasarathy has allowed 98 of 153 decided applications (64%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

64% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below
DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026
// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Pramila Parthasarathy maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 153 disposed applications, the examiner issued 98 allowances and 55 abandonments, yielding an allowance rate of 64% over the decided count. The examiner's practice spans a single art unit within TC 2100. This pooled record reflects outcomes across all applications decided by this examiner in the technology center and does not indicate the outcome of any pending or future application.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates dispositions across all art units assigned to an examiner. The allowance rate represents historical outcomes—allowed and abandoned applications only—and reflects past decision patterns. This figure is a description of what occurred, not a prediction for any specific application. Different art units within the technology center may have varying characteristics. Pooled statistics describe aggregate experience and do not forecast individual case outcomes.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2136
153 APPS · 64% ALLOWANCE

Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer.

64% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 60%
DISPOSITION98 / 55 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending
FIRST ACTION38.5 moart unit avg 27.9 mo
TOTAL PENDENCY54.5 moart unit avg 43.4 mo
// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW100%allowance share
WITHOUT INTERVIEW53%+47 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 36 decided applications with an interview and 117 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Pramila Parthasarathy

  • What is Pramila Parthasarathy's allowance rate?
    The examiner's allowance rate is 64%, calculated over 153 disposed applications (98 allowed, 55 abandoned). This is a historical measure and is not a prediction of any specific application.
  • How many art units does this examiner cover?
    Pramila Parthasarathy's public record spans one art unit within Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security).
  • What does the pooled record mean?
    The pooled record aggregates all dispositions across the examiner's art unit(s). The allowance rate describes past outcomes and is not a prediction of outcomes for any pending application.
  • How many applications has this examiner decided?
    The examiner has disposed of 153 applications in the public record, resulting in 98 allowances and 55 abandonments.
◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →
METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Pramila Parthasarathy has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 153 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP