Examiner Prasith Thammavong has allowed 558 of 642 decided applications (87%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Prasith Thammavong maintains a public record spanning 2 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 642 disposed applications, the examiner has allowed 558, yielding an 87% allowance rate. The allowance rate ranges from 68% to 93% across the art units in this examiner's portfolio. A total of 689 applications have been filed with this examiner, of which 84 were abandoned.
This record aggregates data from multiple art units within TC 2100, pooling allowance rates and application counts across different technology areas. The 87% overall figure represents past outcomes on decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application. Pooled records mask variation between individual art units; the range (68% to 93%) illustrates this variance. Historical figures describe what occurred, not what will occur in future prosecution.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 265 decided applications with an interview and 219 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 47 decided applications with an interview and 111 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Prasith Thammavong has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 689 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP