Examiner Pritisha N Parbadia has allowed 18 of 69 decided applications (26%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Pritisha N Parbadia maintains a public record across two art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 69 disposed applications, the examiner's allowance rate is 26%. This means 18 applications were allowed and 51 were abandoned across the pooled record. The allowance rate represents decided applications only and does not include any pending filings. The examiner's record spans Art Units 2142 and 2145 within TC 2100.
This examiner's pooled record aggregates decisions across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 26% allowance rate describes the historical ratio of allowed to abandoned applications and is calculated from 69 decided cases. Pooled figures reflect past outcomes across different art units and do not constitute a prediction for any individual application. Art-unit-specific data, where available separately, may differ from the aggregate shown here.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 31 decided applications with an interview and 33 without.
Primarily examines neural-network / biological-model computing, and machine learning.
Based on 5 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Pritisha N Parbadia has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 69 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP