Examiner Pursottam Giri has allowed 27 of 137 decided applications (20%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Pursottam Giri maintains a public record across 4 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 204 total applications, 27 were allowed and 110 abandoned, yielding 137 disposed applications. The pooled allowance rate stands at 20% of those decided applications. Allowance rates across the art units range from 12% to 46%, reflecting variation in the examiner's record within this technology center.
This pooled profile aggregates the examiner's work across multiple art units within TC 2100. The 20% overall allowance rate describes historical outcomes across all decided applications in the examiner's record and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Aggregate figures mask unit-level variation; the range of 12% to 46% shows that allowance rates differ substantially among the art units the examiner covers.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 40 decided applications with an interview and 44 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Based on 17 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines machine learning, and neural-network / biological-model computing.
Based on 10 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Pursottam Giri has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 204 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP