What is Examiner Qi Wan's overall allowance rate?

The allowance rate is 56%, based on 240 disposed applications (135 allowed, 105 abandoned). This is a historical figure describing past dispositions and is not a prediction of outcomes on any specific application.

How many art units does this record cover?

The record spans one art unit (Art Unit 2143) within Technology Center 2100.

What does the allowance rate tell me?

The allowance rate describes the share of decided applications that received a final allowance in the examiner's historical record. It is calculated from disposed applications only and does not indicate the probability of allowance on any particular pending case.

Why is the record pooled across art units?

This page presents the examiner's aggregate performance across all their assigned art units. Pooling provides a broad view of overall record but may mask differences between individual art units, which are detailed separately elsewhere on this page.

What is Examiner Qi Wan's overall allowance rate?

The allowance rate is 56%, based on 240 disposed applications (135 allowed, 105 abandoned). This is a historical figure describing past dispositions and is not a prediction of outcomes on any specific application.

How many art units does this record cover?

The record spans one art unit (Art Unit 2143) within Technology Center 2100.

What does the allowance rate tell me?

The allowance rate describes the share of decided applications that received a final allowance in the examiner's historical record. It is calculated from disposed applications only and does not indicate the probability of allowance on any particular pending case.

Why is the record pooled across art units?

This page presents the examiner's aggregate performance across all their assigned art units. Pooling provides a broad view of overall record but may mask differences between individual art units, which are detailed separately elsewhere on this page.

LYNCH·LLP

Book a consultation →

◈ FIND AN EXAMINER OR ART UNIT

◈ USPTO PATENT EXAMINER STATISTICS

Examiner Qi Wan

TECH CENTER 2100 · 1 ART UNIT · 240 DECIDED APPLICATIONS · LAST ACTION SEP 2022

ALLOWANCE RATE = SHARE OF DECIDED APPLICATIONS (ALLOWED + ABANDONED); PENDING EXCLUDED

OVERALL ALLOWANCE RATE · POOLED ACROSS 1 ART UNIT

Examiner Qi Wan has allowed 135 of 240 decided applications (56%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.

56% pooled allowance · benchmarked per art unit below

DATA UPDATED JUNE 25, 2026

// READING THIS EXAMINER

What the data says.

Examiner Qi Wan maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), covering one art unit. Across 240 disposed applications, 135 were allowed and 105 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 56%. This rate reflects the examiner's historical record on decided cases and represents the proportion of allowed applications among all applications with a final disposition. The pooled figure spans all art units within the examiner's purview.

// HOW TO READ THESE NUMBERS

How to read these numbers.

A pooled record aggregates an examiner's performance across multiple art units into a single set of figures. The allowance rate and application counts presented here describe the examiner's past record on decided cases and are not predictions of outcomes on any future or pending application. Individual art units may vary in composition, subject matter, and case volume. Pooled statistics provide a historical overview but do not indicate the outcome of any specific case.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

// BY ART UNIT

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

◈ PRIMARY · ART UNIT 2143

240 APPS · 56% ALLOWANCE

56% allowance (of decided)▏ art-unit average 52%

DISPOSITION135 / 105 / 0allowed / abandoned / pending

FIRST ACTION20.9 moart unit avg 29.5 mo

TOTAL PENDENCY44.2 moart unit avg 45.7 mo

// REJECTION PROFILE

§101 — Subject-matter eligibility64% · art unit 53%

§102 — Anticipation (novelty)64%

§103 — Obviousness100% · art unit 94%

§112 — Written description & definiteness66%

// INTERVIEW SPLIT

Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.

WITH INTERVIEW73%allowance share

WITHOUT INTERVIEW12%+61 pt difference

A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 175 decided applications with an interview and 65 without.

// FAQ

Questions about Examiner Qi Wan

What is Examiner Qi Wan's overall allowance rate?
The allowance rate is 56%, based on 240 disposed applications (135 allowed, 105 abandoned). This is a historical figure describing past dispositions and is not a prediction of outcomes on any specific application.
How many art units does this record cover?
The record spans one art unit (Art Unit 2143) within Technology Center 2100.
What does the allowance rate tell me?
The allowance rate describes the share of decided applications that received a final allowance in the examiner's historical record. It is calculated from disposed applications only and does not indicate the probability of allowance on any particular pending case.
Why is the record pooled across art units?
This page presents the examiner's aggregate performance across all their assigned art units. Pooling provides a broad view of overall record but may mask differences between individual art units, which are detailed separately elsewhere on this page.

◈ RESPONDING TO AN OFFICE ACTION

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.

Book a 30-minute consultation →

METHODOLOGY & DISCLOSURES

Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Qi Wan has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 240 applications.

Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.

These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.

This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP