Examiner Quang N Nguyen has allowed 105 of 149 decided applications (70%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Quang N Nguyen maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 149 disposed applications, 105 were allowed and 44 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 70% over the decided count. The examiner's practice spans one art unit. This pooled record reflects outcomes across all applications decided during the period covered, aggregating results without distinction by art unit or application type.
A pooled record aggregates dispositions across all art units under an examiner's jurisdiction. The allowance rate—here 70% of 149 decided applications—describes past outcomes and is not a prediction of any specific application's fate. Pooled figures mask variation among individual art units; the examiner's record in a particular art unit may differ from the overall aggregate. These statistics are historical and correlational, not causal.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 39 decided applications with an interview and 110 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Quang N Nguyen has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 149 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP