Examiner Quoc A Tran has allowed 738 of 932 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Quoc A Tran maintains a public record across 3 art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Of 932 disposed applications, 738 were allowed, yielding a 79% allowance rate. The allowance rate varies across the examiner's art units, ranging from 55% to 95%. This pooled figure reflects decided cases—allowed and abandoned applications—and excludes pending matters. The breadth of the record spans multiple art units within TC 2100, each with its own allowance-rate profile.
A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, presenting an overall allowance rate rather than unit-specific figures. This aggregate describes the examiner's historical decisions across all assigned art units and is a statistical summary of past outcomes. The pooled allowance rate is not a prediction of any specific application's disposition. Variation across individual art units may reflect differences in subject matter complexity, applicant argument patterns, or examiner assignment. Detailed per-art-unit data appears separately.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 317 decided applications with an interview and 245 without.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 97 decided applications with an interview and 90 without.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 96 decided applications with an interview and 87 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Quoc A Tran has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 961 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP