Examiner Quoc Ly Phu Phung has allowed 13 of 29 decided applications (45%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Quoc Ly Phu Phung maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 54 total applications, 29 have been disposed of (allowed or abandoned). Of those 29 decided applications, 13 were allowed, yielding an allowance rate of 45%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure reflects historical dispositions and does not constitute a prediction for any individual application.
This pooled record aggregates the examiner's work across all assigned art units in TC 2100. The 45% allowance rate is computed from applications already decided—allowed or abandoned—and excludes pending cases. Pooled figures describe past record only and are not predictions about any specific application. For detailed breakdowns by individual art unit, consult the per-art-unit section of this examiner's profile.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Quoc Ly Phu Phung has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 54 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP