Examiner Rachna Singh Desai has allowed 55 of 118 decided applications (47%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Rachna Singh Desai's public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spans one art unit. Over 118 disposed applications, the examiner issued 55 allowances and 63 abandonments, yielding an allowance rate of 47%. This rate is calculated from decided applications only and excludes any pending matters. The record reflects outcomes across the pooled art unit in TC 2100 and represents the examiner's historical dispositions in this subject area.
This pooled record aggregates all art units under Examiner Desai's jurisdiction. The 47% allowance rate describes past dispositions across 118 decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Aggregate figures reflect historical performance and cannot be generalized to individual cases, which depend on claim scope, prior art, and prosecution specifics unique to each application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 66 decided applications with an interview and 52 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Rachna Singh Desai has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 118 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP