Examiner Ralph A Verderamo Iii has allowed 454 of 554 decided applications (82%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Ralph A Verderamo III maintains a public record across three art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 573 total applications, 454 were allowed and 100 abandoned, yielding 554 disposed applications. The pooled allowance rate is 82%. Allowance rates across the examiner's art units range from 75% to 100%. This record reflects decisions made in TC 2100 spanning multiple art-unit areas. The figures describe past dispositions only and are not predictive of outcomes in any individual application.
A pooled record aggregates data across multiple art units, presenting an overall allowance rate rather than per-unit breakdowns. This examiner's 82% allowance rate is calculated from 554 decided applications (allowed and abandoned, excluding pending). The range of 75% to 100% across art units reflects variation in different subject areas within TC 2100. Pooled figures describe historical outcomes and do not predict results in specific cases or individual art units.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 85 decided applications with an interview and 240 without.
Primarily examines computer-aided design (CAD).
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 40 decided applications with an interview and 133 without.
Primarily examines input/output (I/O) data transfer, and memory access and allocation.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 19 decided applications with an interview and 37 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ralph A Verderamo Iii has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 573 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP