Examiner Ramsey Refai has allowed 33 of 74 decided applications (45%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Ramsey Refai maintains a public record spanning three art units in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Over 74 disposed applications, the examiner issued allowances in 33 cases, resulting in a 45% allowance rate. The remaining 41 applications were abandoned. This pooled figure aggregates outcomes across art units 2141, 2152, and 2154, and reflects the examiner's historical dispositions without reference to any individual application or pending matter.
This record aggregates decisions from multiple art units within TC 2100 and represents past outcomes only. The allowance rate is computed from decided applications (allowed plus abandoned), excluding pending cases. Pooled figures describe the examiner's historical record and are not predictions about any specific application's prosecution or outcome. Individual art units may show different patterns; consult per-unit data for finer detail.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 16 decided applications with an interview and 42 without.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Based on 10 applications — too small a sample to characterize the rejection mix reliably; shown for completeness.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ramsey Refai has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 74 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP