Examiner Ramy M Osman

What the data says.

Ramy M Osman maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security), covering one art unit. The examiner has disposed of 94 applications across this coverage. Of those 94 decided applications, 47 were allowed and 47 were abandoned, resulting in an allowance rate of 50%. This pooled figure represents the examiner's overall record in TC 2100 and reflects outcomes across all applications within the covered art unit during the period captured in this data.

How to read these numbers.

This page presents a pooled record aggregating outcomes across all art units under the examiner's jurisdiction in TC 2100. The allowance rate and application counts describe the examiner's past record and are correlational—not predictive. A pooled rate does not forecast the outcome of any specific application. Individual art units may have different allowance rates; those figures appear in a separate section of this profile.

These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →

The record, art unit by art unit.

Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.

Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.

Questions about Examiner Ramy M Osman

• 01What is Ramy M Osman's overall allowance rate?

  The allowance rate is 50%, based on 47 allowed applications out of 94 total disposed applications in TC 2100.
• 02How many art units does this examiner cover?

  The examiner's public record spans 1 art unit (Art Unit 2157) in TC 2100.
• 03What does the allowance rate tell me about my application?

  The pooled allowance rate describes the examiner's historical record and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Individual case outcomes depend on claim scope, prior art, and examination history.
• 04How many applications has this examiner decided?

  The examiner has disposed of 94 applications in TC 2100, comprising 47 allowed and 47 abandoned applications.

Strategy, not paperwork. Talk to the attorney doing the work.

Lynch LLP represents applicants in patent prosecution before the USPTO. Book a consultation to discuss your matter with the attorney who would handle it.