Examiner Ranjit P Doraiswamy has allowed 125 of 186 decided applications (67%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Ranjit P Doraiswamy maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 213 total applications, 186 have been disposed (decided). Of those disposed applications, 125 were allowed and 61 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 67%. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure represents the historical allowance rate across all decided cases and does not constitute a prediction for any individual application.
This record aggregates all applications across the examiner's art units into a single pooled allowance rate. The 67% figure reflects past dispositions and describes the aggregate outcome of decided cases. Pooled statistics combine different art units and cannot be applied to forecast the outcome of any specific application. Historical rates are correlational data only; individual case outcomes depend on claim scope, prior art, and examination history.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines information retrieval and database structures.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 124 decided applications with an interview and 62 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ranjit P Doraiswamy has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 213 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP