Examiner Ranodhi N Serrao has allowed 31 of 63 decided applications (49%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Ranodhi N Serrao maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 63 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 31 and abandoned 32, yielding an allowance rate of 49%. This record spans a single art unit. The allowance rate reflects the ratio of allowed to decided applications in the examiner's pooled history and does not describe any individual application's prospects.
This pooled record aggregates all disposed applications across the examiner's art unit(s). The overall allowance rate of 49% describes past outcomes as a ratio of allowed to decided applications. Pooled figures reflect historical patterns across diverse applications and art units within TC 2100. These statistics are descriptive of the record only and are not predictions about any specific application's outcome.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines artificial-intelligence and machine-learning methods.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 34 decided applications with an interview and 29 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ranodhi N Serrao has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 63 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP