Examiner Ravi K Sinha has allowed 76 of 96 decided applications (79%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Examiner Ravi K Sinha maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security). Across 96 disposed applications, 76 were allowed and 20 were abandoned, yielding an allowance rate of 79% over the decided count. The examiner's record spans a single art unit. This pooled figure represents the aggregate outcome of applications decided in TC 2100 and does not indicate the outcome of any particular application.
A pooled record aggregates outcomes across all art units an examiner oversees. The allowance rate reported here—79%—describes the historical proportion of decided applications that were allowed, computed from disposed (decided) applications only. This aggregate statistic is a snapshot of past dispositions and is not a prediction of outcomes on any individual application.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines software engineering.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 64 decided applications with an interview and 32 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Ravi K Sinha has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 96 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP