Examiner Rayeez R Chowdhury has allowed 489 of 579 decided applications (84%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Rayeez R Chowdhury maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Across 579 disposed applications, the examiner allowed 489, yielding an 84% allowance rate. The allowance rate ranges from 81% to 93% across the examiner's art units. The record reflects decisions on applications that have been either allowed or abandoned; pending applications are excluded from this calculation.
This pooled record aggregates data from multiple art units within TC 2100. The 84% allowance rate describes the examiner's historical record across decided applications and is not a prediction of any specific application's outcome. Figures in a pooled record reflect past decisions and do not forecast results in individual cases, which depend on claim scope, prior art, and examination history.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Primarily examines general computer details, and program control and execution.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 223 decided applications with an interview and 180 without.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 96 decided applications with an interview and 80 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Rayeez R Chowdhury has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 612 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP