Examiner Raymond J Bayerl has allowed 114 of 140 decided applications (81%) in Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security.
Raymond J Bayerl maintains a public record in Technology Center 2100 (Computer Architecture, Software, and Information Security) spanning 2 art units. Across 140 disposed applications, the allowance rate is 81%, with 114 applications allowed and 26 abandoned. This figure represents a pooled aggregate of the examiner's record across both art units. The allowance rate applies only to decided applications and does not reflect pending matters.
This record is a pooled aggregate across multiple art units within TC 2100. The allowance rate of 81% describes historical outcomes on decided applications and is not predictive of any specific application's outcome. Pooled figures mask variation among individual art units; applicants may consult the per-art-unit breakdown for more granular data. Aggregate statistics describe past record only.
These are aggregate statistics from this examiner's past public record — not predictions about any specific application. The per-art-unit figures below show how the record varies across art units. Our approach to patent prosecution →
Each section benchmarks this examiner against that art unit's average. Figures are this examiner's own public record within the art unit; the overall rate above pools them.
Allowance rate for applications with an examiner interview versus without one.
A correlation, not proof that interviews cause allowances. Based on 15 decided applications with an interview and 119 without.
Methodology. This page pools every art unit in which Examiner Raymond J Bayerl has a public record within Technology Center 2100. Statistics are computed from publicly available USPTO records, refreshed on a recurring schedule. This page's data was last updated June 25, 2026. The overall allowance rate is total allowed divided by total decided applications (allowed plus abandoned) across all art units — not an average of the per-art-unit rates; pending applications are excluded. Figures are rounded for display. Pooled sample: 140 applications.
Lynch LLP is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Examiner statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data.
These statistics describe past examiner behavior and do not predict the outcome of any particular application. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Where this page compares an examiner's allowance rate to an art-unit average, that comparison is a factual description of the public record, not a characterization of any individual examiner's conduct or competence.
This page is for general informational purposes and is not legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed by viewing it. Full disclaimers →
ATTORNEY ADVERTISING — Sean Lynch, Partner, Lynch LLP